探索与争鸣 ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3): 50-60.

• 本刊特稿 • 上一篇    下一篇

重识中国与世界(十九) | 全球治理的区域路径

郑先武   

  • 出版日期:2020-03-24 发布日期:2020-03-24

Regional Paths to Global Governance 

  • Online:2020-03-24 Published:2020-03-24

摘要: 从经验和规范上看,区域治理已被视作当代全球治理体系的重要组成部分。“大区域观”将通常界定的特定地理区域治理的互动层次向上延伸至区域间或跨区域,据此提出全球治理的三种区域路径:全球治理中的区域治理——区域作为全球治理体系中的一个内部治理层次,即“从外到内的路径”;区域治理中的全球治理——全球作为区域治理体系中一个外部治理层次,即“从内到外的路径”;全球-地方联结中的区域间治理——新区域作为全球-区域治理体系中的一个新型层次,即“内外融合的路径”。第一种路径的核心力量来自域外行为体,依据的核心制度平台是全球性组织及全球多边机制;第二种路径的核心力量来自域内行为体,依据的核心制度平台是区域组织及区域多边机制;第三种路径的核心力量来自不同区域的区域组织或一组国家,依据的核心制度平台是区域间或跨区域的制度。对湄公河下游早期治理、东南亚气候治理和中国区域间治理等典型案例的分析,揭示了这三种路径的运行机制及其经验合理性。

关键词: 全球治理, 区域治理, 湄公河下游治理, 东南亚气候治理, 中国区域间治理

Abstract: Regional governance has been regarded as an important part of the contemporary global governance system, both empirically and normatively. In this paper, the general concept of the region is adopted to extend the interaction level of the governance of a speci?c geographical region, which is usually de?ned, upward to the inter-regional or trans-regional level, so as to propose three regional paths of global governance. The first path is regional governance in global governance. The second path is global governance in regional governance. The third path is interregional governance in the global-local connection. Finally, typical case studies of the early governance in the lower Mekong basin, the climate governance in Southeast Asia and the interregional governance promoted by China reveal the operating mechanism and action mechanism of these three paths and their empirical rationality.

Key words: global governance, regional governance, governance in the lower Mekong basin, climate governance in Southeast Asia, interregional governance promoted by China