探索与争鸣 ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (9): 94-104.

• 学术争鸣 • 上一篇    下一篇

构建中国阐释学(九) | 从“六经注我”到“我注六经”——现代经学阐释的限度与公共性展开

成祖明
  

  • 出版日期:2020-09-24 发布日期:2020-09-24

From “ Six Scriptures Note Me” to “I Note Six Scriptures”——The Limitation and Public Unfolding of Modern Scriptural Hermeneutics

  • Online:2020-09-24 Published:2020-09-24

摘要: 传统经学阐释一直在有限性与无限性之间徘徊,当阐释离开有限性束缚过度追求无限性时,虽可能盛极一时,但终究会因不被接受而遭淘汰。“六经注我”与“我注六经”精练地表达了阐释的有限性与无限性的有机统一,存在着主体与六经之间阐释的循环。这种阐释循环推动了传统经学的发展。进入现代,古典经学有限性的历史基石坍塌,造成经典意义价值体系的崩解。现代经学理论迭出,都意在追求经典的历史性和客观性,造成了经典价值意义世界的失落。“正典的进路”的提出,扭转了这一现象,将之与集体记忆理论、马克思主义社会学相结合,不仅在现代与后现代的语境中赋予经典以历史合法性,也在更为宏阔的“六经注我”与“我注六经”的阐释循环、公共性的不断展开中,开辟了一个中国现代经学阐释的新时代。

关键词: 现代经学, 阐释, 有限与无限, 阐释学循环

Abstract:

Traditional scriptural hermeneutics has been wandering between the limited and the infinite. When the hermeneutics is not limited, it may be in great bloom, but it will not be accepted and eliminated. “Six Scriptures note me”and“I note Six Scriptures”express the good unity of the definiteness and infinity of hermeneutics, and there is a circle between the subject and Six Scriptures. This circle of hermeneutics promotes the development of traditional scriptural studies. In modern times, the historical cornerstone of traditional scriptural limitation collapsed, which resulted in the collapse of the value system of their significance. The theories of modern scriptural studies are always pursuing the historic and objectivity, which leads to the loss of the world of scriptural value.“Canonical Approach” reversed this phenomenon. And combining with collective memory theory and Marxist sociology, not only the scriptures will be endowed historical legitimacy in the context of modern and post-modern, but also in the process of the hermeneutics circle of“Six Scriptures note me”and“I note Six Scriptures”, their publicity is constantly unfolding, which will open up a new era of modern scriptural studies of China.

Key words: