摘要：
中国写作学认知主要有两条理路：从读者的角度认知作者，从作品的角度认知写作。前者造就了以读者角度为主体的文艺学，后者造就了丰富而发达的文学史学科，这两个学
科甚至一度代替（取消）了建制化的写作学。在它们的夹缝中，“传统文章学”“现代写
作学”交织发育，但均未获得正果，直到 21 世纪初“创意写作学”兴起。中文创意写
作学科发展不应走美国式反建制化之路或传统中文学科的建制道路，而应在中西互鉴的
基础上，结合学科本身的特点，走中国特色新建制主义之路。中文创意写作的新建制化
发展，要重新回到“五四”文学源头，赓续其“创意论”经验，充分重视学术性和应用
型的结合、创意思维养成与技术技能培养的结合、系统性与开放性的结合，聚焦创新、
融合、发展三性建设，形成中国路径、中国气派、中国风格。
Abstract: Traditional risk identification follows the objective theory of risk, taking natural risks and the
objective factors within risks as the main objects of cognition. With computational rationality as the cognitive
foundation and engineering technology as the means of cognition, it has formed a technical path for risk
identification. However, in the post-industrial era, human-induced risks have overtaken natural risks as the
primary concern, with a growing trend towards the subjectivity and social nature of risks. Human actions and
decisions now play a central role in risk. Modern risks are more often attributed to human decisions rather than
the external world. This fundamental change in the content and structure of risks has posed a challenge to the
technical path of risk identification. Therefore, it is necessary to recognize the postmodern dilemmas faced
by the technical path of risk identification based on computational rationality, reflect on this technical path to
adapt to the modern transformation of risks, and on this basis, explore the possibility of constructing a new
cognitive path for risk identification.
林来梵. [J]. 探索与争鸣, 2025(5): 35-80.