摘要： 作为学科的现代文学，已走过七十多年历程，前辈学人如樊骏、黄修己等都曾对学科发展史和研究方法论投注研究精力，几十年中，关于现代文学研究的历史与现状等话题的讨论不曾间断。在学科建制日臻成熟的同时，学科形态也渐趋固化，正如陈平原教授所说：“‘文学’作为一个‘学科’，逐渐被建设成为独立自足的专业领域。”近年来，不断有学者提起“反思现代文学研究范式”“现代文学的危机”等话题；也有一批研究者尝试“以跳出现代文学的方式迎来现代文学新的生长空间”（刘勇、萨支山）。而后一种尝试在年轻一代学人身上体现得更为自觉。 本期“一百年与二十年：百年中国文学思想史”正是聚焦现代文学研究的新视野、新方法，邀请四位在这一领域有所思考、实践，并初步形成自身研究风格和路径的青年学者展开探讨。季剑青通过梳理王瑶的文学史观，指出其文学史研究方法留给后人最珍贵的遗产是对“时代内容”和“总体性视野”的把握，这在今天尤为重要。袁一丹以自身研究经历为案例，剖析精神史研究与生活史研究的互补，尤其是来自生活史视角的对传统精英视野的补白。李国华从“形式”的维度切入，探讨现代文学的“形式”作为思想、感情的中介所蕴含的独特意味，以及现代作家的“形式”实践本身所包含的思想意义。金浪重申了美学与文学批评之间的亲缘关系，并将这一亲密关系视为中国现代美学以及现代批评区别于西方的重要特质，由此撬动中国现代文学的深层观念内核。

Abstract: As modern literature studies have advanced to the present day, the discipline has achieved a high level of institutional maturity, while its form has gradually become rigidified. In recent years, scholars have increasingly raised topics such as “reflecting on the paradigms of modern literature studies”, “the challenges and future of modern literature studies”, and “the crisis of modern literature”. Concurrently, a group of researchers has attempted to seek disciplinary breakthroughs, aiming to transcend the existing horizons and frameworks of modern literature studies. The latter endeavor is particularly evident among the younger generation of scholars. This group of discussions focuses precisely on new perspectives and approaches in modern literature studies, inviting four young scholars who have engaged in thinking and practice in this field and have preliminarily developed their own research styles and paths to participate in the exploration.