摘要： 吴静教授提出的“人机交互情感操控‘黑洞’”论，敏锐揭示了算法的资本逻辑对人类主体性的潜在侵蚀，具有重要的警示意义。然而，其基于“技术—主体”二元对立的批判视域，倾向于将技术视为单向度的操控力量，忽视了人机互动中更为隐秘且复杂的生成性逻辑。人机混合社交并非单纯的异化陷阱，而是在流动现代性语境下，个体为寻求本体性安全而与技术系统达成的一种双向“合意”。根据温尼科特的“过渡性客体”与唐·伊德的“技术间性”理论，AI伴侣实际创造了一个具有补偿性与演练功能的“潜在空间”，用户并非全然被动的受控客体，而是通过“悬置怀疑”的主动策略，利用算法的镜像功能进行情感代偿与自我修复。人机关系并非对现实人际关系的零和替代，而是现代社会情感结构中的一种功能性补充。只有超越技术决定论的悲观论调，厘清其背后的生成性逻辑，才能为人机共生的未来提供一种更为辩证的理解维度。

关键词: 人机混合社交, 生成性逻辑, 本体性安全, 过渡性客体, 技术间性

Abstract: Professor Wu Jing’s theory of the “black hole of emotional manipulation in human-machine interaction” acutely reveals the potential erosion of human subjectivity by algorithmic capitalism, carrying significant cautionary implications. However, her critical perspective, based on the binary opposition between “technology and subject”, tends to regard technology as a one-way controlling force, neglecting the more subtle and complex generative logic inherent in human-machine interactions. Human-machine hybrid sociality is not merely a trap of alienation but rather a two-way “consensus” and “mutual construction” formed between individuals and technological systems in the context of liquid modernity. Drawing on D. W. Winnicott’s theory of the “transitional object” and Don Ihde’s concept of “technological intersubjectivity”, this paper finds that AI companions actually create a “potential space” with compensatory and rehearsal functions. In this space, users are not entirely passive controlled objects but rather active participants who employ the strategy of “suspending disbelief” and utilize algorithmic mirroring for emotional compensation and self-repair. The human-machine relationship is not a zero-sum replacement for real-world interpersonal relationships but rather a functional supplement within the emotional structure of modern society. Only by transcending the pessimistic rhetoric of technological determinism and clarifying the underlying generative logic can we provide a more dialectical understanding of the future of human-machine symbiosis.

Key words: human-machine hybrid sociality, generative logic, ontological security, transitional object, technological intersubjectivity