摘要： 版权营利性维权诉讼是知识产权商业化背景下诉讼市场化的产物。在理论和实践中，此类诉讼因深陷形式法治和实质法治、工具理性和价值理性、个人权益与公共利益的价值冲突而备受争议。鉴于司法在平衡社会利益关系、协调不同层次价值冲突，以及推动版权市场良性发展方面的独特优势，版权营利性维权诉讼的司法治理意义重大。然而，当前对版权营利性维权诉讼的应对，存在法定赔偿泛化致著作权法激励机制异化、撤诉调解式结案加剧市场投机化、禁令救济滥用引发社会认知权责意识割裂等问题。对此，必须始终恪守审慎功能主义的司法立场，在法定赔偿适用标准、撤回起诉审查流程及禁令救济实施方面进行适当限制，通过公正、合理的司法裁判引导版权维权诉讼依法依规进行，在保障版权权益的同时，推动版权市场持续健康发展。

关键词: 版权营利性维权诉讼, 审慎功能主义, 法定赔偿, 禁令救济

Abstract: Profit-driven copyright infringement litigation represents a product of litigation marketization within the context of intellectual property commercialization. Theoretically and practically, such litigation has been embroiled in value conflicts between formal and substantive rule of law, instrumental rationality and value rationality, as well as individual rights and public interests, thus sparking widespread controversy. Given the judiciary’s unique advantages in balancing social interests, coordinating multi-level value conflicts, and promoting the sound development of the copyright market, judicial governance over profit-driven copyright infringement litigation holds significant importance. However, the current judicial responses to such litigation face issues, including the alienation of the incentive mechanism in copyright law due to the generalization of statutory compensation, the intensification of market speculation through settlement withdrawals and mediations, and the fragmentation of social awareness regarding rights and responsibilities caused by the abuse of injunctive relief. To tackle these problems, it is essential to consistently uphold a prudent functionalist judicial stance, imposing appropriate restrictions on the application criteria for statutory compensation, refining the review process for case withdrawals, and regulating the implementation of injunctive relief. Through fair and reasonable judicial adjudications, copyright infringement litigation should be guided to proceed in compliance with laws and regulations, ensuring the proper exercise of copyright rights while fostering the sustained and healthy development of the copyright market.

Key words: profit-driven copyright litigation, prudential functionalism, statutory compensation, injunctive relief