摘要： 在城市主义政策导向下，人类生活的空间多被简单划分为城市和乡村两种类型，超大城市与腹地村庄构成人口空间集聚的两种极端形态。在二者之间，还有人口稀少却幅员辽阔的“超广域城市”。作为国家治理的地方单位，这些建制反映了我国“胡焕庸线”以西地区较为普遍的城市形态，也是国家空间治理的城市表达。从空间控制到空间融合，正视地理空间与社会关系的分离，成为超广域城市国土治理与社会治理协同的政策起点。从重建“附近”到治理融合，超广域城市发展需要超越传统地缘关系、区域关系、城乡关系的讨论，把人与自然的协同发展纳入整体性的空间分析之中，进而形成兼顾生态维系、城市发展的多维治理方案。
关键词:
城市政治,
超广域城市,
空间干预,
治理融合,
附近
Abstract:
Under the policy of urbanism, the space of human life has been divided into urban and rural areas, with megacities and hinterland villages constituting the two extremes of spatial agglomeration. In between, however, there are the sparsely populated but vast “ultra-wide area cities”. From spatial control to spatial integration, addressing the separation of geospatial and social relations has become the policy starting point for synergizing territorial and social governance in ultra-wide area cities. From reconstruction of the “neighborhood” to governance integration, the new wide-area urban development needs to go beyond the traditional discussion of geo-relationships, regional relationships, and urban-rural relationships, and incorporate the synergistic development of human beings and nature into holistic spatial analyses, so as to form a multidimensional governance scheme that takes into account ecological maintenance and urban development.
Key words:
urban politics
,
ultra-wide area cities
,
spatial interventions
,
governance integration
,
neighborhood
姚尚建. 文明互鉴与城市中国（三）|地缘、区域与城市“制造”——超广域城市的空间干预与治理融合[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2025(7): 116-129.
Yao Shangjian. Geography, Region and Urban “Making”: Spatial Interventions and Governance Integration in Ultra-Wide Area Cities[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2025(7): 116-129.