探索与争鸣 ›› 2025, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (7): 54-63.

• 本刊特稿 • 上一篇    下一篇

重大基本理论问题研究(十七)|治场:“有形之手”与治理秩序的生成

徐勇   

  • 出版日期:2025-07-20 发布日期:2025-07-20
  • 作者简介:徐勇,华中师范大学政治学与国家治理研究院 (中国农村研究院) 资深教授。

The Governance Field: The “Visible Hand” and the Emergence of Governance Order

Xu Yong
  

  • Online:2025-07-20 Published:2025-07-20

摘要: 场域、力量和秩序是一组紧密相关的概念。通过对场域的学术谱系的梳理,提出“场有力,力在场”的基本命题,可以回答社会秩序是如何生成的问题。市场是商品交换的场所,市场上交易双方是相互依赖的关系,交易是自愿行为,交易者通过交换满足需要,在交换中形成一般性规则,价格信号自动调节人们的行为边界,从而自生自发出经济秩序。这种自我调节的秩序源于“在场”的经济力量,即“无形之手”。在大量公共场所,人们可以自由进入,但并不相互依赖;人们相互交往,但不以对方为自己存在的条件,并会产生行为冲突,难以通过各得其所自动生成秩序,而必须借助于作为“有形之手”的公共权力进行人为调节。这种需要借助超越当事人的力量进行治理的场域可以定义为“治场”。治场有力,力在场中。运用公共权力构建公共秩序是一般性规则。这一规则在人们实际生活场域中的具体表现不同,治理秩序的生成取决于“在场”的力量对比和变化。将场域理论引入治理过程,并构建“治场”的概念,有助于认识治理秩序的生成是一个复杂和动态的过程。

关键词: 场域, 治场, 公共权力, 治理秩序, “有形之手”

Abstract:

Field, power, and order are fundamentally interconnected concepts. Drawing upon the intellectual genealogy of field theory, this paper advances the core proposition that “the field is inherently powerful, as force is embedded within it”, thereby addressing the central question of how social order emerges. Trading, as a voluntary act, enables participants to fulfill mutual needs through exchange. Within this process, generalized rules emerge organically: price signals autonomously regulate behavioral boundaries, giving rise to a spontaneously generated economic order. This self-regulating order emerges from the “presence” of economic forces, namely the “invisible hand”. In many public spaces, individuals enjoy free access but remain independent rather than interdependent. While they interact, they do not rely on one another as existential conditions, often leading to conflicts. Such interactions rarely produce spontaneous order through mere co-presence, necessitating intervention by public power as the “visible hand”. A field that requires governance by an external authority beyond the involved parties can thus be defined as the “governance field”. The emergence of governance order depends on the distribution and transformation of power within the “field”. By introducing field theory into governance analysis and conceptualizing the “governance field”, we emphasize that the formation of governance order is a complex and evolving process.

Key words: