探索与争鸣 ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3): 42-49.

• 本刊特稿 • 上一篇    下一篇

重识中国与世界(十九) | 全球经济治理的国家性:延续还是变革

田野,卢玫   

  • 出版日期:2020-03-24 发布日期:2020-03-24

Stateness of Global Economic Governance: Continuity or Change 

  • Online:2020-03-24 Published:2020-03-24

摘要: 全球治理往往被看作“没有政府的治理”。但世界政治的现实表明,国家在全球经济治理中从来都是核心行为体。从历史经验上看,全球经济治理主要有三种路径:多边治理、单边治理和网络化治理。多边治理无论从历史起源上还是从现实运作上都是由大国主导的,单边治理更直接地体现了国际关系中的等级制,网络化治理只是通过扁平化的形式掩盖了网络中隐含的权力结构。自2008年全球金融危机以来,国家在全球经济治理中的作用更加强化,多边治理、单边治理和网络化治理中的国家性都更加凸显出来。当前全球经济治理中国家性的增强是大国间战略竞争加剧、国家主导型经济模式优势彰显、国内不平等扩大、民族主义复兴和强人政治回归这些因素交织作用的结果。

关键词: 全球经济治理, 国家性, 多边治理, 单边治理, 网络化治理

Abstract:  Global governance is usually seen as “governance without government”. However, the realities of world politics show that states have always been central actors in global economic governance. Multilateral governance is dominated by greatpowers from the historical origin or from the actual operation, and unilateral governance more directly reflects the hierarchy in international relations, and networked governance only conceals the hidden power structure in the network. Since the 2008 ?nancial crisis, the role of the state in global economic governance has been strengthened, and the stateness of multilateral governance, unilateral governance and networked governance has become more highlighted. The strengthening of stateness in the current global economic governance is the result of the interweaving effects of increased strategic competition among great powers, the manifestation of the advantages of the state-led economic model, the widening of domestic inequality, the revival of nationalism and the return of strongman politics. 

Key words:  global economic governance, stateness, multilateral governance, unilateral governance, networked governance