探索与争鸣 ›› 2021, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (6): 181-190.

• 庆祝中国共产党成立100周年专刊 • 上一篇    下一篇

新时代|“世界性百家争鸣”与中国学术的未来

杨国荣   

  • 出版日期:2021-06-24 发布日期:2021-06-24

“Worldwide Contention of a Hundred Schools of Thought” and the Future of Chinese Academics

  • Online:2021-06-24 Published:2021-06-24

摘要:

20世纪以来的中国哲学既呈现世界性的意义,也以某种方式参与了世界范围内的百家争鸣。20世纪20年代发生的科玄之战已折射了现代西方科学主义与人文主义的论争,而这一时期哲学家体系性思想建构的出现,则从更为内在的方面展现以上趋向。这些哲学系统既呈现了现代形态,又从不同方面对西方文明和西方哲学提出批评,其中展现的哲学立场不仅蕴含宽泛的世界意义,而且以独特的方式回应了世界范围内的相关哲学论争。从科玄论战,到哲学家的个性化哲学建构,从马克思主义的主导,到中国哲学、西方哲学、马克思主义哲学之间的对话,从多样化与相对性的不同进路,到一致与百虑的不同侧重,中国的现代哲学已超越了地域性,并获得世界性的意义。进一步看,以具体化扬弃抽象性和教条化、以多样性扬弃相对化以及一致与百虑的交融,构成了中国哲学更深入地参与世界性百家争鸣的观念前提,通过切实的建设性工作,提供对相关问题的系统思考,则是参与这种争鸣的现实方式。

Abstract:

Chinese philosophy since the 20th century is not only of worldwide signifificance, but participates in the worldwide contention of a hundred schools of thought in some way. The polemics between Science and Metaphysics in the 1920s has refracted the controversy between modern Western scientism and humanism. The cotemporaneous philosophical systems present modern forms, criticize Western civilization and philosophy and respond to relevant philosophical debates around the world in a unique way. From the dominance of Marxism to the dialogue among Chinese philosophy, Western philosophy and Marxism, through the approaches from diversifification to consistency, modern Chinese philosophy has transcended regionality and gained worldwide significance. Sublating abstractness and dogmatization with concretization and diversity is the conceptual prerequisite for Chinese philosophy to participate deeply in the global contention, of which the realistic way is to provide systematic thinking.

Key words:

font-family:Calibri, font-size:10.5pt, "> color:#231F20, font-size:9.5pt, ">polemics between Science and Metaphysics|Chinese philosophy|Chinese academics|world signifificance|worldwide contention of a hundred schools of thought