探索与争鸣 ›› 2024, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2): 25-43.

• 知识生产与治理变革 • 上一篇    下一篇

人-技共生时代的“数智”悖论与转向——对“7·20”特大暴雨灾害期间郑州三个住区的比较研究

朱政德   

  • 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-04-03
  • 作者简介:北京大学新闻与传播学院博士研究生。(北京 100871)
  • 基金资助:

    国家社科基金重大项目“健全网络综合治理体系研究”(23ZDA086)

The Paradox and Shift of “Digital Intelligence” in the Age of Human-DT Symbiosis : A Comparative Study of Three Residential Areas in Zhengzhou During the “7·20” Heavy Rainstorm

Zhu Zhengde   

  • Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-04-03

摘要:

“万物皆媒”驱动数字基础设施孵化泛在的人-技共生环境,数字技术强势干预人伦日用,使有关智慧存废的超人类主义勃兴,其代表思潮认定与数字技术彻底共生的数字原住民/移民会进化为智慧递增的种族,余者因失“智”而沦为“数字难民”。该论断因循西方心理与认知科学的智慧属性论,杂糅社会达标主义、技术决定论,罔顾数字难民的复杂成因。据此,回归源自中国语境的智慧过程论或是一种反思路径。数字难民是与数字技术共生但未把现实挑战转化成智慧过程的人,与之相反则是不同程度的“数智者”。以郑州“7·20”特大暴雨灾害这例人-技共生环境中的典型挑战为背景,筛选郑州三个住区展开比较,发现人-技专性拟互利共生使人长期陷入替代性适应进而坐失智慧过程;处于人-技中性共生的人凭借单位隐形在场落实类智慧过程,较大程度彰显“数智者”特征;人-技兼性互利共生使人凭借补偿性演化落实智慧过程,充分彰显“数智者”特征。不同程度的“数智者”存在共性,即建成比任何基础设施更具基础性的情感基础设施,它们与中国传统的道德情感“仁爱”接合,摄智归仁,由此扬弃技术的家长制权威,实现“数智”转向。

关键词:

数智者, 数字难民, 智慧, 人-技共生, 情感基础设施

Abstract:

“Everything is a medium” drives the incubation of a ubiquitous human technology symbiotic environment in digital infrastructure. Digital technology strongly intervenes in human relations and daily use, leading to the rise of superhumanism related to the preservation and abolition of wisdom. Its representative trend believes that digital indigenous/immigrant communities that completely coexist with digital technology will evolve into intelligent races, while others will become “digital refugees” due to losing their “intelligence”. This statement disregards the complex causes of digital refugees. Based on this, returning to the process of wisdom theory derived from the Chinese context may be a reflective path. Subsequently, taking the “7·20” heavy rainstorm which is a typical challenge within the human-DT symbiosis circumstances as the backdrop, three residential areas in Zhengzhou are compared. It is found that the human-DT obligate pseudo-reciprocity mode leads individuals into long-term alternative adaptation, missing the wisdom process and becoming digital refugees. Individuals in the human-DT neutralism mode can implement the quasi-wisdom process by relying on the invisible presence of “Danwei”, showcasing characteristics of digital wise persons to a greater extent. The human-DT facultative mutualism mode enables individuals to implement the wisdom process through compensatory evolution, fully demonstrating traits of digital wise persons. Different degrees of digital wise persons manifest a common feature: building up the affective infrastructure which is more elemental than any other kind of infrastructure.It connects with the traditional Chinese moral sentiment of “Ren’ai”(benevolence and love), so that wisdom can be returned to benevolence, and benevolence can be used to nourish wisdom.

Key words:

digital wise person, digital refugee, wisdom, human-DT symbiosis, affective infrastructure