摘要： 不同于机械时代技术物的“座架”性质，当今 AI 技术社会的技术物日益呈现出社会整体>智能化与系统化的特征。AI 化成为社会生活及其组织运作的前提，而 AI 技术物及其与世界的连通，也越来越呈现为“管道”形式。AI 作为技术物，逐渐被赋予社会存在与生存论意涵。西蒙东基于电子管技术设定了技术物的两重规定：不确定性与技术个化。但在 AI 技术社会中，AI 作为技术物越来越需要与人类整体意义上的确定性相关联，技术个体化也不应被滥用，有理由规避各种打着奇异化旗号的社会离散现象。AI 作为技术物，意味着劳动可替代性的增强，因此应更本质地理解劳动与 AI 的关系，劳资关系仍是理解AI 技术物的前提。AI 技术社会的关键问题，还是 AI 逐步替代人类活动时，如何理解与认同 AI 社会，以及如何运用和保护人类的知识创造能力。

关键词: 技术社会, 人工智能, 技术物, 人类活动

Abstract: Unlike the “enframing” nature of technical objects in the mechanical era, technical objects in today’s AI technological society increasingly exhibit characteristics of overall social intellectualization and systematization. AI-ization has become a prerequisite for social life and its organizational operations, with AI technical objects and their connectivity to the world increasingly taking on a “pipeline” form. As a technical object, AI is gradually being endowed with connotations of social existence and existential significance. Based on vacuum tube technology, Simondon established a dual specification for technical objects: indeterminacy and technical individualization. However, in an AI technological society, AI as a technical object increasingly needs to be associated with the determinacy of humanity as a whole, and technical individualization should not be misused; there is justification to avoid various social fragmentation phenomena carried out under the guise of singularization. AI as a technical object implies an increase in the replaceability of labor, requiring us to understand the relationship between labor and AI more fundamentally, with the labor-capital relationship remaining the premise for understanding AI technical objects. The key issue in an AI technological society is still how to understand and identify with AI society as AI gradually replaces human activities, as well as how to utilize and protect human knowledge-creating capabilities.

Key words: technological society, artificial intelligence, technical object, human activity