摘要： 张江先生对阐释逻辑做了系统的思考，但是有两个重要问题需要进一步商榷：其一，文中“精神科学”的提法值得商榷，该词在德国学界的使用源于精神科学与自然科学的对立，在我国学界的使用则与现当代学科分类的历史形成和约定俗成有原则区别；其二，自然科学方法应用于人文社会科学时应该谨慎，圆周率π是一种比喻和象征的修辞用法，和精确的定量分析并不相同，而用正态分布来论证公共理性的方法也值得推敲。

关键词: 精神科学, 自然科学, 阐释, 诠释

Abstract: Mr. Zhang Jiang has made a systematic thinking on hermeneutic logic. That made a valuable contribution to the construction of contemporary hermeneutic theory with Chinese characteristics, however, there are two important issues that need further discussion. First, the term “spiritual science” in his paper is questionable. The use of the word in German academic circles originates from the opposition between spiritual science and natural science, while in China, it is di?erent from the historical formation and conventional formation of modern and contemporary discipline classi?cation. Second, the natural science method should be cautious when applied to the humanities and social sciences. π is a rhetorical usage of metaphor and symbol, which is di?erent from the accurate quantitative analysis. The method of demonstrating public rationality by normal distribution is also worth considering.

Key words:  spiritual science, natural science, hermeneutics, interpretation